Why Radiation Causes Breast Cancer
Posted on 11. Jun, 2010 by Robert in Consciousness, Home, Medicine, Science, Show All, Spiritual, Uncategorized
Compelling reading for everyone. Hard scientific evidence concerning the safety of mammograms and Xrays for women.
From http://naturalnews.com/028959_radiation_brst_cancer.html
Why radiation causes breast cancer
A contribution from my friend Frank DeMarco
(NaturalNews) It’s well-established that exposure to ionizing radiation can trigger mutations and other genetic damage and cause normal cells to become malignant. So it seems amazing how mainstream medicine frequently dismisses the idea that medical imaging tests from mammograms to CT scans could play much of a role in causing breast cancer. Take this example from the web site for Cornell University’s Program on Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors:
In answer to the question “Is ionizing radiation a cause of breast cancer?”, the Cornell experts say “Yes” and note “.. female breast tissue is highly susceptible to radiation effects.” But then they pooh-pooh the possible hazard from mammography x-rays saying the risk …”should not be a factor in individual decisions to undergo this procedure. The same is true for most diagnostic x-ray procedures.”
If that’s not confusing enough, they turn around and state: “Nonetheless, unnecessary radiation exposures should be avoided and continued vigilance is required to ensure that the benefits associated with specific procedures outweigh the future risks.”
Common sense suggests there is plenty of reason to be worried about radiation causing breast cancer. And now there’s a new reason to be concerned. Researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) have discovered that radiation exposure can alter cells’ microenvironment (the environment surrounding cells). And that greatly raises the odds future cells will become cancerous.
The reason is that signals from a cell’s microenvironment, altered by radiation exposure, can cause a cell’s phenotype (made up of all its biochemical and physical characteristics) to change by regulating or de-regulating the way a cell uses its genes. The result can be a cell that not only becomes pre-cancerous but that passes this pre-malignant condition on to future cells.
“Our work shows that radiation can change the microenvironment of breast cells, and this in turn can allow the growth of abnormal cells with a long-lived phenotype that have a much greater potential to be cancerous,” Paul Yaswen, a cell biologist and breast cancer research specialist with Berkeley Lab’s Life Sciences Division, said in a statement to the press.
“Many in the cancer research community, especially radiobiologists, have been slow to acknowledge and incorporate in their work the idea that cells in human tissues are not independent entities, but are highly communicative with each other and with their microenvironment,” he added.
For their study, Yaswen and his research teams used human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs), the cells that line breast ducts, where most breast cancers start. When placed in a culture dish, the vast majority of HMECs display a phenotype that allows them to divide between five and 20 times until they become what is known as senescent, or unable to divide. However, there are also some variants of these cells which have a phenotype that allows them to continue dividing for many weeks in culture. Known as a vHMEC phenotype, this type of breast cell arises spontaneously and is more susceptible to malignancy because it lacks a tumor-suppressing protein dubbed p16.
To find out what radiation exposure does to the cellular environment and how it could impact the future of cell behavior, the Berkeley Lab scientists grew sets of HMECs from normal breast tissue in culture dishes for about a week. Then they zapped each set with a single treatment of a low-to-moderate dose of radiation and compared the irradiated cells to sets of breast cells that had not been irradiated.
The results, just published in the on-line journal Breast Cancer Research, showed that four to six weeks after the radiation exposure, the normal breast cancer cells had stopped dividing far earlier than they would have normally — and this premature cell senescence had accelerated the outgrowth of vHMECS.
“However, by getting normal cells to prematurely age and stop dividing, the radiation exposure created space for epigenetically altered cells that would otherwise have been filled by normal cells. In other words, the radiation promoted the growth of pre-cancerous cells by making the environment that surrounded the cells more hospitable to their continued growth,” Yaswen explained in the press statement.
The researchers pointed out that the levels of radiation used in their experiments were not as much as a woman would be exposed to during a single routine mammogram but were comparable to those a woman could receive during a CT scans or radiotherapy “and could represent sources of concern.”
Of course, women are often pushed to get annual mammograms, raising their overall radiation exposure through the years. And, as NaturalNews has reported, previous research has already provided compelling evidence linking mammography to breast cancer.
For example, a report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association’s Archives of Internal Medicine found that the start of screening mammography programs throughout Europe has been associated with increased incidence of breast cancer http://www.naturalnews.com/024901.html And a Johns Hopkins study published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute concluded radiation exposure from mammograms could trigger malignancies in women at risk for genetic breast cancer http://naturalnews.com/025560_cancer_brst_cancer_mammograms.html
For more information:
http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146798
http://envirocancer.cornell.edu/factsheet/physical/fs52.radiation.cfm#mammog
http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20146798
Continued at
http://scribd.com/doc/32770754/Study-Shows-How-Radiation-Causes-Breast-Cancer



medical assistant
11. Jun, 2010
found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later
pharmacy tech
13. Jun, 2010
Keep posting stuff like this i really like it
Carmelo Nash
14. Jun, 2010
If I had a dime for every time I came here! Incredible writing.
breast cancer risk factors
15. Jun, 2010
Your article Why Radiation Causes Breast Cancer – CONVERSATIONS WITH A MYSTIC made me stop and read it properly. I was just looking for stuff on breast cancer risk factors and was skimming most of it but I did read your’s properly. Bits of it didn’t really gel with me but I appreciate that you took the time to write it so you care. That’s good enough for me!
breast cancer risk factors
15. Jun, 2010
It makes me so angry. Not your post but the fact that so many women, and obviously some men have to experience the trauma of breast cancer. I found your post when I was looking for breast cancer risk factors. I thought it was worth a couple of minutes to read. The more we research, the more knowledge we have, the better prepared we are to fight, and beat, this disease.
Lorie
23. Jul, 2010
Not only should women NOT get mammograms, they should be taking iodine. Women with breast cancer have been shown to have high levels of bromide toxicity. Bromides, a lighter halide than iodine will take up residence in the body’s iodine receptors (which are located ALL over the body and not just the thyroid) and leave women’s breasts vulnerable to cancer. Thermograms are a much safer screening tool for breast cell abnormality.
http://www.breastcancerchoices.org/iodine
http://www.iodine4health.com
Dr. David Brownstein’s book: Iodine: Why you need it, Why you can’t do without it.
Robert
23. Jul, 2010
G’day Lorie,
Well said, thanks.
Just about everyone in the Western world has an iodine deficiency. Here in Australia, they recently made it compulsory to add iodine to salt. This says a lot.
An easy way to tell if you have an iodine deficiency is to paint your wrists, or other body part. If your iodine level is okay, it will take a few days to face. Most people will find the stain disappear in a few hours. Painting skin is a good way to rectify an iodine deficiency, but you have to do it regularly.
Iodine cures are also excellent. See http://www.earthclinic.com/Remedies/iodine.html
I’ve tried several of them myself. The one for food poisoning works well, and will cure this in a couple of hours.
robert